Model architecture & methodology
Assess objectives, assumptions, data lineage, feature design, target construction and model selection.
Independent validation of quantitative investment and AI models by Isabelle Armanville, PhD — a former institutional quantitative portfolio manager with 20+ years of experience developing, implementing and overseeing investment strategies.
Request an Independent Model Audit ↗Our approach is led by a former quantitative portfolio manager who personally developed, coded and implemented machine-learning strategies in live investment portfolios, with responsibility for multi-billion portfolios. This experience connects technical validation with investment reality — where robustness, risk, execution and accountability matter.
A model can look compelling in a research notebook and still fail in live portfolio management. Independent review must test both the mathematics and the practical investment consequences.
Assess objectives, assumptions, data lineage, feature design, target construction and model selection.
Review backtests, leakage, overfitting, stability, regime sensitivity and out-of-sample behaviour.
Evaluate transaction costs, turnover, capacity, constraints, risk exposures and the gap between model output and investable results.
Deliver clear findings, prioritized remediation and an independent view of model risks and operational controls.
A compelling backtest is not proof of investment robustness. Examine the risks with a former quantitative portfolio manager.
▶For asset managers, family offices, CIOs, investment committees and model-risk teams seeking an independent assessment of a quantitative strategy or machine-learning investment model.
An external quantitative investment specialist with hands-on experience in model design, portfolio management and live implementation can challenge both statistical validity and investment practicality. Reviews at Los Flamingos are led by Isabelle Armanville, PhD, a former institutional quant portfolio manager.
Warning signs include unstable out-of-sample results, excessive parameter tuning, data leakage, unrealistic transaction costs, weak regime robustness and performance that disappears after realistic portfolio constraints.
Depending on scope: data provenance, feature and target design, validation methodology, backtesting controls, robustness, model governance, turnover, transaction costs, capacity and portfolio-level risks.
A scoped independent assessment, documented findings, a prioritised risk register and practical remediation recommendations. Deliverables and confidentiality terms are agreed before the engagement.
Discuss the model, investment use case, stakeholders and review objectives.
Agree access, testing priorities, deliverables and confidentiality safeguards.
Challenge methodology, validation, operational assumptions and investability.
Receive prioritised observations and practical recommendations.
Discuss a confidential review of your AI, machine-learning or quantitative investment models.
Discuss a Confidential Model Audit ↗